Yesterday the Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan was also
elected President of Turkey. The reason why Erdogan has sought the
largely ceremonial office of President is that he has exceeded his term
limit as Prime Minister. However Erdogan has made it clear that he
intends to change the national constitution to grant the President more
power and possibly even scrap term limits all together. This is intended
to ensure that Erdogan can remain in power in Turkey for almost a
quarter of a century allowing him to act as a modern King or Emperor of
Turkey.
Obviously this development is very bad news for democracy and secularism
in Turkey. However it is also very bad news for security and stability
across the entire region because Erdogan is very much a loose cannon.
For the past three years he has been waging an undeclared war against
Turkey's neighbour Syria and two weeks ago he threatened to declare war
on Israel by sending Turkish warships to invade Israeli territorial
waters. Fortunately Erdogan did eventually step back from that threat
against Israel but the early indications are that since winning the
Presidency Erdogan may seek to resurrect the plan.
Perhaps emboldened by Erdogan's victory the Islamic State of Iraq and
the Levant (ISIL) who have been strong Turkish allies in Syria launched
fresh advances on Baghdad from Anbar province in the west and Salah
ad-Din province in the north. This prompted the Iraqi army in Baghdad to
increase security around the capital - particularly in the "Green Zone"
- by deploying troops on the streets. As this occurred around the time
that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Malaki was giving a speech in which
he announced his intention to file a criminal complaint against the
Iraqi President Faud Masum this has wrongly been described as a coup
attempt by some people. However it is of course impossible for a
government to mount a coup against itself.
Al-Malaki's speech did rather serve to highlight Iraq's core political
problem at the moment. Despite the nation being under foreign invasion
since January 2014 the nation did hold a Parliamentary election in April
2014 which returned al-Malaki's State of Law Party as the largest
block. As such Masum was obligated to appoint al-Malaki as Prime
Minister. Unfortunately the US have somehow got it into their heads that
turning Iraq - the Worlds largest oil exporter - into a client state of
Saudi Arabia - the Worlds second largest oil exporter - would be a good
idea. As a result they have been putting huge pressure on Masum to
violate the national constitution and overthrow al-Malaki disregarding
the election result. This has obviously paralysed Iraq's response to the
ISIL invasion. Today the State of Law Party have compromised by
nominating Haider al-Abadi as a replacement
Prime Minister and that nomination has been accepted by Masum. However
as al-Abadi is a Shia like al-Malaki we are still waiting to find out if
the US will permit him to act as Prime Minister.
While this has been going on the US has been
focused on telling us how hugely successful things have been in the
northern Nineveh and Abril provinces where it is conducting an extremely
limited military operation.
The first of these somewhat wild claims is that US air-strikes have allowed Kurdish Peshmerga forces to re-take the towns of Makhmour and Gweir.
While it is undoubtedly true that Peshmerga forces have re-taken the
towns of Makhmour and Gweir and there were two US air-strikes in the
province on Friday (8/8/14) the two events seem to be almost entirely
unrelated. The US air-strikes occured some 80km (50 miles) to the
north-west on Friday and destroyed a single artillery gun, a single
mortar position and four vehicles which is hardly overwhelming force.
Also it is important to remember that the Peshmerga didn't collapse nor
were over-run by ISIL's advance. Instead they tactically withdrew in
order to re-organise their forces so they could focus their efforts on
counter-attacking specific targets. So while it is unlikely that the US
air-strikes hurt the Peshmerga's advance it seems that it was something
that was going to happen regardless of what the US did or didn't do.
The US have also been testing the bounds of reality somewhat with their
claim that air-strikes helped the Peshmerga to rescue 20,000 people from
Sinjar mountain. Again the Peshmerga have been operating to the south
of Sinjar mountain and on Saturday (9/8/14) and Sunday (10/8/14) the US
carried out air-strikes against 9 ISIL vehicles and a single mortar
position. However the 20,000 people were rescued from the north side of
the mountain by Kurdish Peoples Protection Units (YPG) operating out of
Syria. The rescued people are of course now in Syria and trying to make
their way back to Iraq. As a result this seems to be more a case of the
Kurds acting to protect their own while the US stood around watching.
The worrying development from Sinjar mountain has been the discovery
that the estimates of the number of people trapped there have been
dramatically too low. It now turns out that there were 60,000 rather
then 40,000 trapped meaning that even after this rescue there are still
40,000 trapped. This highlights how woefully insufficient the US'
efforts to deliver aid to these people have been. According to latest
figures the US has succeeded in delivering 74,000 meals but only 15,000
gallons of much more vital water. So even counting the roughly 30% of
those deliveries that have been destroyed on impact and are therefore
unusable the US has only delivered only 38% of the most desperately
needed supplies leaving 62% (25,000 people) at very real risk of dying
of thirst in the coming hours and days.
In terms of US military action in the time since my previous there
simply hasn't been any. The US has conducted zero strikes against
precisely zero targets.
(Originally Posted on 11/8/14 UK - date).
No comments:
Post a Comment