Over the last couple of days the US has continued to provoke the
Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK). On Sunday (31/3/13) they
deployed top of the line F-22 Raptor fighter aircraft of South Korea.
They followed this up on Monday (1/4/13) by deploying two warships (the
USS John McCain and the USS Decatur) to the region amid continuing
speculation about also deploying a floating X-band radar platform to
region. On Tuesday (2/4/13) US Secretary of State John Kerry visited
South Korea and made thinly veiled threats about protecting the nation
against DPRK aggression. Today the US announced that it will be
deploying a THAD ballistic missile defence system to Guam.
The DPRK has obviously been responding to this provocation. On Tuesday
it announced that it would re-start the operation of it's nuclear
reactor and uranium enrichment plant at Nyongbyon. Today the DPRK
prevented South Koreans travelling to the Kaesong industrial park in the
DPRK which is operated in co-operation with South Korea. What is
interesting though is that the DPRK's reactions seem to be serving the
interests of it's traditional enemy the US at the expense of itself and
its traditional ally China.
Take the re-starting of the Nyongbyon nuclear reactor. While much has
been made in the western media about this reactors ability to produce
the plutonium needed to make nuclear weapons this is not everyone's
main concern. Instead they are worried that the DPRK is not
technologically advanced enough to safely operate a nuclear reactor. So
when Nyongbyon resumes operation there is a good chance it will simply
blow up. This places the DPRK, South Korea and China at great risk of
being showered with radioactive fall-out. The US of course will be
unaffected by this while China and South Korea will also have to deal
with an increased flow of refugees flooding out of the DPRK while
dealing with the nuclear clean up.
Then there is the closure of the Kaesong industrial park. While it is
difficult to come by accurate assessments of the DPRK economy as a whole
and the Kaesong park in particular it is estimated that Kaesong
contributes around USD10bn every year to the DPRK economy which
represents roughly a quarter of their total annual GDP of around
USD40bn. More importantly the money generated at Kaesong is foreign
currency which is essential for the DPRK to buy imports such as fuel
which is already being made difficult by sanctions and embargoes.
Therefore if Kaesong remains shuttered for long it creates a very real
threat that the DPRK will collapse economically creating floods of
refugees into both South Korea and China.
This seems an incredibly stupid course of action for the US to be
taking. Although the provocation of the DPRK is making life difficult
for China it is also making life incredibly difficult for the US allies
in the region such as South Korea and Japan along with nations across
south-east Asia such as Vietnam and Cambodia that the US is attempting
to improve relations with by forcing them all to work ten times harder
to assess new threats on their doorstep. Their job is not been made any
easier by the silly little references the US keeps throwing in. For
example the USS John McCain is named after the John McCain that US
President Obama defeated in 2008 prior to putting "Pivot towards the
Pacific" policy in place. Likewise the speculation about the X-Band
radar platform came on Monday when Chris Brown was working hard to
promote his new album "X" - a name which in itself seems intended to
cause maximum headaches. Put simply this is not how the US goes about
making friends in south-east Asia.
The US' actions are also at great risk of having an extremely negative
impact on the DPRK's transition towards democracy. In the DPRK you have
an incredibly young, idealistic and inexperienced leader in the shape of
Kim Jong-Un who seems desperate to move away from his nations past so
his people can enjoy the same freedoms and quality of life enjoyed by
people in the US. Kim Jong-Un is clearly the one who is making the
decisions at the moment. However he is surrounded by much older and more
experienced generals appointed by his father and grandfather who
clearly don't share his good intentions and are constantly looking over
his shoulder for evidence that he is making mistakes in order to
sideline him.
As the crisis continues the evidence of Kim Jong-Un's strategic failings
are starting to become more apparent. For example the closing of the
border preventing South Korean workers travelling to and from the
Kaesong industrial park was clearly intended to coincide with Rihanna's
crossing of the US/Canada border. The problem was that the DPRK's
estimate was out by around 24 hours. Also the way that the DPRK is
currently behaving is making it much more difficult for traditional
allies such as China to provide it with assistance and it is hardly
likely that the US is suddenly going to repay the DPRK for all the help
it's giving them against China. This coupled with the loss of revenue
from the shuttering of the Kaesong industrial park is soon going to make
Kim Jong-Un's position untenable amongst his generals. Signs of this
pressure are already beginning to show with the appointment of Pak
Pong-Ju as the DPRK's Prime Minister. Pak Pong-Ju is Kim Jong-Un's uncle
and mentor. Therefore his appointment to such a powerful position can
either be interpreted as sign of Kim Jong-Un attempting to shore up his
position or a concession that he is struggling in his role and needs
help.
Therefore the US' long term objective seems to be to significantly limit
Kim Jong-Un's influence in the DPRK and in doing so preventing the
nation emerging from international isolation and instituting democratic
reforms in order to become a responsible member of the global community.
Sadly this seems indicative of the US entire "Pivot towards the
Pacific" policy which is seeing it tolerate some deeply unpleasant
regimes in places like Myanmar (Burma), Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos
simply to weaken those nations relationship with a China that has been
gently nudging them to reform. No wonder the Secretary General of the UN
(a South Korean) has basically told the US to stop.
(Originally Posted) 20:20 on 3/4/13.
No comments:
Post a Comment