In my last post on the subject I pointed out that Rihanna's CIA
handlers/Live Nation (the management) had left Rihanna dumped in a hotel
overlooking Sydney harbour surrounded by celebrations marking the 100th
anniversary of the formation of the Australian navy. This was of course
intended to stress Rihanna out through all the noise and disruption
along with paranoia that some of the assembled warships could be using
their electronic surveillance equipment to spy on Rihanna. Also you
would think that someone who is used to being the centre of attention
for a fanbase known as "The Navy" might feel a little put out by close 1
million people turning out to celebrate another navy leaving Rihanna
more or less totally ignored.
Therefore I said that this situation provided the management an
opportunity to demonstrate that it had abandoned its campaign against
Rihanna by allowing her to avoid the Australian celebrations by
travelling onto Auckland, New Zealand ahead of Rihanna's concert there
today. Unfortunately the management decided to do the exact opposite.
Firstly Lauryn Hill was released from prison in New York where she was
serving a sentence for tax evasion. Like Rihanna Lauryn Hill is a black,
female singer so her release was the US very publicly trying to send
the message that if Rihanna were to leave for New Zealand there would
not be any consequences in terms of the current Inland Revenue Service
(IRS) audit of Rihanna over tax evasion and the associated lawsuit
against Berdon LLP. Therefore this was intended to put pressure on
Rihanna by giving the impression (that could well be false) that she
could leave Australia any time she liked. Rihanna just had to make the
decision herself.
Secondly at roughly the same time of Friday (4/10/13) a man was arrested
after attempting to break into Rihanna's Los Angeles home. This is
believed to be the same man who attempted to break into Rihanna's home
on Sunday (29/9/13). Obviously I don't think I need to explain why
having someone attempting to break into your home especially when you're
not there is a stressful experience. However by being seen to so
publicly attempt to stress Rihanna out the management were also trying
to encourage the navies in Sydney harbour to spy on Rihanna by making it
look like there was something dramatic going on. Also the arrest took
place at around 5AM Sydney time which is when I would have thought
Rihanna would have been trying to get some sleep especially with the day
long anniversary celebrations starting at around 9AM.
Although there has been no official word I understand that Rihanna did
leave Sydney for New Zealand at some point on Saturday afternoon/evening
(local). As an observer I would have to say that the failure by Rihanna
or anyone in her core tour party to mention this was due more to
confusion and fear of how to act in a stressful situation rather then
any malicious intent.
The US' attack of Rihanna did continue into Saturday with the news that a
female worker at a zoo in Oklahoma was attacked by a tiger and may lose
her arm. The zoo has stated that the tiger won't be destroyed because
they claim it was the zoo workers fault that she was attacked. On
Thursday (3/10/13) I explained how the UK has been briefing hard against
the US' Rihanna operation in order to maximise the damage it does to
the US' international reputation.
Part of this was the case of Phillip Simelane a violent offender with a
string of previous convictions and serious psychological problems who is
meant to represent Chris Brown. A failure by the relevant authorities
(police, probation service etc) to management the threat posed by
Simelane meant that he was able to murder Christina Edkins an innocent
teenage girl who is meant to represent Rihanna on a bus in Birmingham,
UK which is meant to represent Rihanna's tour bus. Although the crime
took place in March 2013 when Rihanna and Chris Brown were reuniting
around the time of Rihanna's California concerts Simelane was convicted
on Wednesday (2/10/13). During the attack Simelane was wearing a jacket
emblazoned with a large image of a tiger.
Therefore the claim that the Oklahoma zoo worker was at fault for her
attack was an attempt to blame Rihanna for the fact that Chris Brown
assaulted her. The fact that the zoo announced that it will not be
destroying the tiger in response to the attack was intended to send the
message that Chris Brown will not have his restraining order reinstated
or face any further punishment over his attack on Rihanna. I personally
take this as a good sign because it shows the pressure on the management
to do something about Chris Brown is now so great they feel need to
issue a statement. However I think this likely to stress Rihanna out
because I don't think she has quite realised that the argument about
Chris Brown's fate is all about the management wanting the send the
message that they do not abandon their agents no matter the cost rather
then any aspect of Rihanna's behaviour.
Under these circumstances you would perhaps excuse Rihanna for delivering a poor performance in Auckland.
Obviously the management's information blackout is still in full
effect. However the local media in New Zealand has completely ignored
this so I can tell you that Rihanna arrived on stage about 45-50 minutes
late which is beyond the expected 15-20 minutes of lateness and
starting to get to the point where it is a problem. Rihanna then went on
to perform the standard set-list and costume changes. While no-one is
talking in terms of a poor performance Rihanna seems to be slipping
slightly from the highpoint that was the first Sydney concert. I am
though arrogant enough to believe that the delay in Rihanna getting on
stage was cause by the confusion created by me inexplicably waking up
just as Rihanna was scheduled to take to the stage. If the reports of a
50 minute delay are correct then Rihanna actually took to the stage just
as my alarm clock was going off which at that point would have been
picked up by my Blackberry. However it was also at around this point
that I fell back to sleep.
(Originally Posted) 12:25 on 6/10/13 (UK date).
No comments:
Post a Comment