As you may have worked out from the CIA's decision to deploy Chris Brown
to Switzerland while Rihanna is in neighbouring Germany there are two
big elections coming up in Africa this week. The first takes place in
Mali on Sunday (29/7/13) and the second takes place in Zimbabwe on
Wednesday (31/7/13).
The election is Mali is nothing more than a sick joke. The nation is
still essentially in a state of war with the government and electoral
commission unable to operate across great swathes of the north country
and there are around 500,000 people who have been displaced by fighting
within the country meaning they will be unable to vote. On top of that
some bright spark has decided that this very poor and disorganised
nation must provide each registered voter with an electronic ID card in
order to allow them to vote. Rather predictably this system has been
beset with problems from the start the main of which being that a vast
number of registered voters have simply not being issued with ID cards.
Nobody knows exactly how many registered voters have not been issued
with an ID card but none of Mali's 300,000 registered 18 year olds will
be allowed to vote. Of towns with adult populations over 1000 people 226
will receive no voter ID cards at all and in 406 towns only 0.5% of
registered voters will only receive ID cards. This adds up to around 1
million voters who will be denied the right to take part in the
election. On top of that you have obvious inconsistencies such as only
39 voter ID's being issued to Malians living in Morocco which is one of
the main migration destinations for Malians emigrating. Finally the
electoral commissions inability to reach the north of the country along
with tensions with the ethnic Tuareg's which has seen election workers
kidnapped means that a majority of voters that have not only been
registered but also issued with ID cards will be denied the right to
vote because no-one has given them their ID cards.
Therefore the intention of the Malian election seems quite simply to
cause a disputed result with the majority of those in the north of the
country excluded from the election. The hope is that this will cause a
north/south split which will reignite tensions between the government
based in the south and the Tuareg's based in the north. This means the
civil war will start again creating the space for Islamist terrorists to
restart their campaign just as the majority French troops leave and the
less well trained African United Nations (UN) Peacekeeping force take
over putting extreme pressure on the relatively weak African governments
taking part.
As such my advice to Mali on it's election is to simply ignore it and
its result. That's because regardless of who wins for the foreseeable
future the nation is really going to be run by the UN and the French
because they're the ones providing the troops.
Wednesday's election in Zimbabwe is going to be slightly more
complicated because since the disputed 2005 election the two main
parties have split. The ruling ZANU-PF has splintered with the emergence
of ZAPU while the MDC has splintered to create the MDC-T which is a
vehicle for Morgan Tsvangirai. ZAPU is supposed to represent an
alternative for ZANU-PF voters who would rather do without the vendetta
the west has against the ZANU-PF leader Robert Mugabe while the MDC is
supposed to represent an alternative for MDC-T voters who could do
without Morgan Tsvangirai who is largely seen as both a coward and a
western stooge. However the two splinter parties are likely to cancel
each other out leaving a close battle between ZANU-PF and the MDC-T.
The problem is that regardless of the actual result the MDC-T's western
backers led by the UK intend to use the election as a way to overthrow
Mugabe as they've been trying to do ever since Mugabe took Zimbabwe out
of the UK Commonwealth. As such they've been spending a lot of money on
foreign satellite TV channels to lay the groundwork for claims that
ZANU-PF have stolen the election. For example it is around the time the
Zimbabwean election result is scheduled to be announced we will discover
if Shrien Dewani will appeal to the UK Supreme Court or accept his
extradition to South Africa. As it is likely that ZANU-PF will
legitimately win the election and Mugabe doesn't have a track record of
taking defeat well any dispute over the election is likely to result in
widespread violence. This will immediately result in a flood of
Zimbabwean refugees into South Africa just as South Africa is trying to
deal with the situation in Mali.
Therefore I think it would actually be better if ZANU-PF won Zimbabwe's
election and for the opposition to respect that outcome regardless.
That's because since the disputed 2005 election Zimbabwe has effectively
been run by South Africa with both the economy and the political
situation gradually improving. Therefore I think it would be better for
this slow and gradual improvement to continue under the 89 year old
Mugabe rather than having the nation plunged into chaos in an effort to
hand the nation over to Tsvangirai who will have a lot of debts to pay
amongst his foreign backers.
(Originally Posted) 23:45 on 27/7/13.
No comments:
Post a Comment