We are now entering our fourth day of relentless coverage of the crash
of Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 over Ukraine on Thursday (17/7/14).
Amid the wild accusations, inflammatory rhetoric and the almost
deafening drum beat of war there is one vital question that everyone
seems almost afraid to ask - What was MH17 doing when it crashed?
According to data provided by Ukrainian Air Traffic Control at the time
it crashed MH17 had veered some 300 miles (480km) off its intended
course putting it substantially to the north of the flightpath normally
used by aircraft travelling between the Netherlands and Malaysia. MH17
had also descended 5000ft (152m) below the usual cruising altitude of
38,000ft (1158m) to an altitude of just 33,000ft (1005m). This
unexplained change in course put MH17 in a section of air-space that was
closed below 32,000ft (975m) as it was combat zone where anti-aircraft
fire was to be expected and all aircraft were presumed to be military.
Normally anything less then 1000ft (30.5m) of vertical separation is
considered dangerous because it is so difficult to accurately gauge
distance using radar. As a result there seems to be a very strong case
indicating that MH17 was being operated negligently at the time it
crashed.
The other big thing that has bothered me about the coverage of the
incident is that through listening the the proclamations of the British,
Dutch and US government's you would get the impression that Russia is
obstructing the investigation into the crash. In circumstances such as
these the responsibility to investigate air-crashes falls to the
International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO) which is a branch of
the United Nations. As far as I can tell no-one has instructed the ICAO
to open an investigation. As a result no investigation has been opened
and no investigation team has been assembled let alone dispatched
anywhere. With no investigation taking place it is simply impossible for
Russia or anyone else to obstruct it.
What has happened on the ground is that representatives of the
Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) have been
dispatched to the crash site. A quasi-military organisation the OSCE's
remit is conflict prevention, arms control, press freedom and election
monitoring. It has no remit to, capacity for or experience in air-crash
investigation. Ever since OSCE monitors tried to force their way into
Crimea in March 2014 without permission they have been viewed as having a
clear pro-junta bias and as a result there have been numerous occasions
where OSCE monitors have been detained by anti-Kiev rebels. As such the
only possible explanation I can think of for sending OSCE monitors to
the MH17 crash site is to provoke a confrontation in the hope of
delaying the opening of an investigation into the crash.
Provocation aside a reason why the ICAO have not yet been instructed to
carry out an investigation into the MH17 crash is that ICAO
investigations tend to focus on establishing facts and improving
procedures to avoid incidents being repeated rather then assigning blame
and calling for vengeance. For example following the ICAO investigation
into the 1973 shooting down of Libyan Arab Airlines flight LN114 no
further action was taken against Israel because due to a navigation
error the aircraft had strayed into a combat zone. Although it was
hampered by both the US and the Soviet's refusing to hand over relevant
information the ICAO investigation into the 1983 shooting down of Korean
Airlines flight KAL007 found that the main contributing factor to the
crash was a "lack of situational awareness and flight deck coordination"
by the crew which caused the aircraft to stray into restricted
air-space. The aircraft manufacturer and operator were then ordered to
re-design the flight controls to prevent the mistake being repeated.
While I'm on the subject of air-crash investigations I should point out
that Ukraine actually has a particularly bad record in this area. In
October 2001 they shot down Siberian Airlines flight 1812 on route from
Israel to Russia killing all 78 people on board. The Ukrainians denied
that they were responsible for two full years until they finally forced
to admit that they had shot it down with an anti-aircraft missile.
(Originally Posted) 12:40 on 20/7/14 (UK date).
No comments:
Post a Comment