At around 21:30 (23:30 local) yesterday (31/7/14) the United Nations
(UN) and the United States (US) announced that a cease-fire had been
agreed between Israel and Hamas. Over the next couple of hours both
Hamas and then Israel agreed to the cease-fire.
That cease-fire was scheduled to begin at 05:00 (08:00 local) today and
was set to last 72 hours until 05:00 (08:00) on Monday (4/8/14). During
that time Israeli Defence Force (IDF) troops would remain in position
and continue their work destroying Hamas' tunnel network. They would
also return fire if fired upon. The cease-fire would also allow for
talks between Hamas and Israel to begin in Egypt.
There are obviously a number of humanitarian advantages to a cease-fire
not least because it would give civilians are break from the constant
horrors of war. It would also have give local hospitals, Gazan emergency
services and local relief agencies an opportunity to re-stock and begin
making repairs to Gaza's civilian infrastructure including the water
supply and sewage treatment services. Most importantly though it would
have given the United Nations Relief Works Agency (UNRWA) time to
reorganise their operations.
At a dramatic UN Security Council (UNSC) briefing yesterday the UNRWA
and it's parent body the UN Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian
Affairs (UNOCHA) admitted that its response to the conflict has fallen
well below the required standard. As a result it is struggling to cope
with the some 240,000 Gazans who have been internally displaced by the
fighting. Fortunately UNRWA doesn't have to operate in Israel where some
300,000 people have been internally displaced. The UNRWA main problem
seems to be that it is operating as if all of Gaza was a combat zone and
is therefore sheltering people from across Gaza. However only around
45% of Gaza is actually experiencing combat so UNRWA could do a better
job of making sure that people aren't being needlessly evacuated from
areas where there isn't fighting putting needless pressure on their
resources.
My main concern about the cease-fire was that Hamas seemed to be viewing
it not as a humanitarian exercise but part of a tactical plan to gain a
battlefield advantage. In the first instance any cease-fire allows
Hamas the time it desperately needs to re-organise its forces to better
fight the IDF in the future. As Hamas has no chance of winning this
conflict that would only serve to prolong the fighting causing more
death and humanitarian suffering.
In the second instance Hamas seemed intent on provoking Israel into
breaking the cease-fire. That would then be used to increase
international pressure on Israel through the UN. After all the UK holds
the Presidency of the UNSC in August, UNRWA representative in Gaza Chris
Gunness is British as is Valerie Amos the head of UNOCHA.
Hamas seemed to lay the groundwork for this provocation yesterday
evening with a large - by their standards - offensive against southern
Israel which has not received a moment of coverage in the British media
or on CNN. As is common with most militarys in circumstances such as
these the IDF grant themselves a 24 hour grace period so they can inform
the relevant soldiers families in person. However it appears that Hamas
knocked out power and communication systems across a wide area of
southern Israel in and around the town of Sdot Negev. They then opened
fire with barrages of mortar fire to act as a cover for multiple tunnel
raids into Israel to kill or kidnap Israeli soldiers or civilians. They
succeeded in killing 5 IDF soldiers and there are persistent rumours
that 1 IDF soldier has been kidnapped.
Whenever a soldier in whatever army is killed or kidnapped the first
reaction of the other soldiers in their unit is to retaliate hard and
fast against the enemy. As such the sole purpose of this Hamas offensive
seems to have been to provoke Israel into hitting back hard against
Gaza either breaking any cease-fire or expanding their operations in
Gaza maximising the civilian casualties. This escalation would then be
exploited in order to increase international pressure on Israel. Prior
to the start of the offensive Hamas put out multiple statements talking
of an imminent victory.
As it turns out Hamas had to break the cease-fire themselves. Just one
hour into the cease-fire (around 06:00/09:00) Hamas launched a mortar
barrage against an IDF position near the town of Rafah. As this attack
was eerily similar to the start of the attack near Sdot Negev the IDF
returned fire in order to protect themselves. This was rapidly followed
up by Hamas rocket fire into Israel leading the Israeli government to
declare the cease-fire breached and therefore over.
Hopefully talks can continue in Egypt because Hamas must have realised
that if they continue to fight both Israel and Egypt whilst severely
straining their relationship with both Iran and Hezbollah they will
ultimately end up destroying themselves.
11:15 on 1/8/14 (UK date).
Edited at around 19:10 on 1/8/14 (UK date) to add;
As I was writing the above the IDF confirmed that one of their soldiers
had indeed been kidnapped close to Rafah in an incident that began just
64 minutes into the cease-fire. What appears to have happened is that
Hamas' offensive at Sdot Negev failed so they simply continued their
attempts into the cease-fire.
So far Hamas have yet to confirm that they kidnapped the soldier because
they've suddenly realised that this was a very, very stupid thing to do
and are now trying to sow the seeds of doubt that they were
responsible. However it is quite clear what their intention was;
In the event that a soldier is kidnapped the IDF immediately invoke what
is known as the "Hannibal Protocol." This is so well established it was
actually briefly referenced in episode 4 of "The Honourable Woman."
Acting rather like a no hostage agreement it allows IDF commanders to
use any and all force (within international law) to prevent the taking
of a hostage. This includes the killing their own soldier and if Ariel
Sharon was still in power I honestly think that he would have nuked Gaza
by this point.
However what Hamas were hoping for is that the IDF would respond with
largely indiscriminate use of air-power and artillery fire before
kicking down every door in Gaza. The hope being that the large civilian
death toll this would have produced would have triggered the members of
the international community who have a clear anti-Israeli agenda to
increase pressure on Israel to stop their demolition of Hamas' military
infrastructure. Failing that Hamas are obviously holding the kidnapped
soldier within their underground tunnel network in the hope that this
will discourage Israel from dismantling that network any further.
As of yet Israel haven't really responded to the kidnapping although
it's cabinet is meeting as I write. As the kidnapping has clearly been
carried out to alter the dynamic of the conflict I think Israel's best
response would be to continue as if the kidnapping had never happened.
As such I prefer not to think of the missing solider as kidnapped by
simply as the first soldier into the tunnel.
(Originally Posted on 1/8/14 - UK date).
No comments:
Post a Comment