At 16:00 (19:00 local) yesterday both Israel and the Palestinian
factions declared an open ended cease-fire bringing to an end the latest
round of fighting in Gaza. As is sort of the form the start of the
cease-fire was proceeded by a massive increase in rockets and mortars
being fired from Gaza into Israel which brought the total for the day to
182.
However rather then being made up of almost constant fire this
concentrated on intense barrages of mortar fire - often 20+ at a time -
on civilian areas directly on the border. This was quite clearly an
attempt by Hamas to kill as many Israelis as possible before the
cease-fire came into effect. Hamas were partially successful when a
barrage of fire minutes before the start of the cease-fire killed two
men aged 43 and 55 on the Nirim Kibbutz in Eshkol. As such this seems
like an appropriate moment for all the left-wingers who have been
rounding on Israel during this conflict to go and find out what a
kibbutz is.
Despite these two late deaths Israel did not retaliate and allowed the
cease-fire to come into effect. In Gaza this was marked by a Hamas
spokesman who declared it to be a victory for Hamas who had done what no
Arab army have been able to do by defeating the Israeli army.
Considering the death and destruction that Hamas brought on the people
of Gaza over the past 50 days by starting this war I found his next
claim that Hamas "had been the defenders of the Palestinian people and
will now become the servants of the people" even harder to believe.
However it did provide an insight into why Hamas chose to start this war
with Israel.
Certainly since the end of the Cold War Hamas has been reliant on the
support of Iran and Syria. They have also benefited from an Egyptian
government that has been happy to turn a blind eye to their activities.
This all changed in 2012 when Mohamed Morsi of Hamas' parent
organisation the Muslim Brotherhood was elected President of Egypt and
the Gulf Monarchies decided that Syria would be the next country to be
overthrown as part of the so-called Arab Spring. The ensuing war meant
that Syria was no longer in a position to support anyone and instead had
to rely on support from Iran and Hamas' long term ally Hezbollah. Hamas
however decided to throw their lot in entirely with Morsi and declared
their support for groups such as the Islamic State of Iraq and the
Levant (ISIL) who were fighting the Syrian government. This completely
isolated Hamas from Iran and Hezbollah who continue to fight and die at
the hands of ISIL in Syria.
Within a year the Egyptian people decided that they'd had enough of
Morsi and he was ousted from power. This prompted Hamas to send fighters
and weapons into Egypt to fight on behalf of the Muslim Brotherhood. In
response Egypt closed the Rafah crossing removing a legal route for
goods to flow in and out of Gaza. They also destroyed many of the
smuggling tunnels into Gaza which not only provided Hamas with a steady
flow of weapons but also a vital revenue stream from taxes levied on the
smuggled goods. Added to the fact that Hamas was also clashing with the
Fatah dominated Palestinian Authority (PA) who cut off funding to Gaza
this crippled Hamas financially to the point that they were unable to
pay salaries to any public sector workers in Gaza.
Needless to say this made Hamas spectacularly unpopular with the people
of Gaza so they decided to start this war in a effort to convince Gaza
that Israel was the bigger enemy then Hamas so they would start
supporting Hamas as the people who were bravely protecting them from
Israeli aggression.
With over 85% of their weapons stores destroyed and at least 800 of
their fighters including at least 4 senior commanders killed it is easy
to see what Hamas has lost during this war. It is much more difficult
though to tell what they have won to back up their claim of victory not
least because the exact details of the cease-fire agreement have yet to
be made public. In fact I'm getting the distinct impression that the
only thing firmly agreed in the cease-fire declaration is that the
shooting will stop and all parties will meet up again in 30 days to
start working out the details.
However it is clear that at the core of the agreement is the third
compromise presented by Egypt. This will see Hamas drop their demands
for air and sea ports in Gaza in return for fishermen being allowed to
set sail up to 20 nautical miles off the coast. Israel will then discuss
increasing the type and volume of goods flowing into Gaza and the
number of visas issued to Gazans to travel into Israel in return for a
cessation of violence on the part of Hamas. This essentially leaves
Hamas where they were at the start of the conflict because it is a myth
that Gaza has been under siege by Israel.
Since 2009 around 200 trucks loaded with goods including food, medical
supplies and building materials along with hundreds of thousands of
litres of cooking gas and gasoline pass through each of the five border
crossings from Israel into Gaza every single day. This has continued
throughout the war and is why Hamas were able to seriously injure
several people at the Erez border crossing on Sunday (24/8/14). While
Israel - like any other country - does technically restrict the flow of
goods in and out of its borders the main cause of shortages in Gaza
these days is that having not been paid for months people simply can't
afford anything. The other major problem has been the stopping of the
flow of cheaper goods from Egypt due to the closing of the Rafah
crossing with Egypt which was done by Egypt in response to Hamas'
sending of weapons and fighters to attack Egyptian soldiers and
civilians.
If they are able to negotiate an increase in the flow of goods into Gaza
and I suspect that Israel will be more then helpful in that effort
although Hamas will need customers that is likely to mean even worse
news for Hamas. The collection of excise duty (tax) on border crossings
between Israel and Gaza is wholly the responsibility of Israel. Once
they have removed their share the Palestinians share is handed over to
the PA who then decide what money to send to Gaza. However Israel has
frequently been known to withhold the Palestinian share from the PA who
have also frequently been known to withhold funds from Gaza due to a
split between Hamas and Fatah who dominate the PA. So unless Hamas can
dramatically improve their relationship with Fatah and ideally with
Egypt an increase in the flow of goods from Israel into Gaza could well
end up making life there even more miserable rather then improving it.
Through its public statement since the cease-fire though Hamas seems
extremely confident that its budget problems are about to be magically
solved and all their employees will be paid all the money they're owed.
This suggests to me that rather then securing any concession from Israel
Hamas actually signed up to the cease-fire because Qatar offered them a
huge bribe under the banner of "reconstruction efforts." This means
that Hamas are fast on course for becoming just as corrupt and
ineffective as Fatah and the burgeoning Palestinian state is set to be
spilt apart as the West Bank becomes Saudi Arabia's Embassy in Israel
and Gaza becomes Qatar's. After all if the Israel/Palestine conflict was
resolved how would these Gulf Monarchs be able to show Zakat towards
the Arab peoples?
So in summary even by the standards of wars between Israel and Palestine
I think that this one has been particularly pointless meaning that
there really has been no winners. However if I was forced to chose I
would say that Israel has won although if someone launches an unprovoked
attack on you stopping them is really the only victory you can achieve.
(Originally Posted) 20:20 on 27/8/14 (UK date).
No comments:
Post a Comment