On Monday (6/5/13) Rihanna played her highly controversial Boston
concert. Although simply appearing in the city so soon after the
marathon bombings should have been stressful enough for Rihanna and
damaging enough to her reputation Rihanna's CIA handlers were hard at
work increasing the pressure on her and further linking her to the
terrorist attack.
Primarily this involved a Court hearing for Robel Phillipos - the US
citizen who had been charged with assisting the suspected marathon
bombers after the attack took place. As Phillipos has always been
intended to be a metaphor for Chris Brown the fact that he was released
on USD100,000 bail bond, forced to wear an electronic tag and been
confined to his mothers home was supposed to be interpreted as a sign
that Chris Brown will face similar restrictions while awaiting trial for
multiple criminal offences. The accompanying news that Tarmalan
Tsarnaev's mother intends to return him to his place of birth (Russia)
for burial was intended to look like an attempt to promote discussion
about whether Chris Brown will be allowed to remain in his state of
residence (California) or whether he will be returned to his state of
birth (West Virginia) while awaiting trial. However as it was extremely
unlikely that the charges against Phillipos were simply going to be
dropped the fact he has been released on bail rather then being remanded
in custody was actually a sign that the CIA handlers have no intention
of lifting their protection of Chris Brown because they either consider
the operation to still be viable or don't want to lose face by admitting
that it's not.
Next came the news that 1990's pop-star Lauryn Hill has been sent to
prison for tax evasion. Rihanna has been under investigation by the
Inland Revenue Service (IRS) for the best part of three years over tax
evasion allegations relating to Berdon LLP's mismanagement of her
financial affairs. Therefore the imprisoning of Lauryn Hill for the same
offence that Rihanna is being investigated for was a naked threat to
Rihanna that unless she obeys she too will be put in prison. However it
must be said that as long as Rihanna's handlers know that the IRS
investigation will make her compliant there is no chance of the IRS
investigation ending.
Then - just after I went to bed - the news broke that Amanda Berry (a US
woman who has been missing since 2003) had been found safe and well
living with two other missing women and three men in a house a few
streets away from where she went missing in Cleavland, Ohio, US.
Although the three men who were immediately arrested were hispanic they
were brothers which is slang for black men. When you smoke as much
marijuana as Rihanna does the name "Amanda Berry" sounds like the
phrase; "A man to bury." Therefore the news that the US has got 'a man
to bury' and three brothers had been arrested for holding a woman
prisoner was intended to be interpreted as further indication that
Rihanna was the prisoner and the US now intends to kill or imprison
Chris Brown and three further mystery men over her treatment. Putting
aside the fact that Rihanna is still clearly hopelessly devoted to Chris
Brown it is never nice to hear yourself referred to as "the victim."
As Berry and the two other women appeared to have been living in a
crowded residential area they knew well for 10 years without attempting
to escape this story promotes discussion about the phenomenon by which
during long periods of captivity prisoners form an emotional attachment
to their highly abusive captors. This is commonly known as 'Stockholm
Syndrome' although that is not recognised as a scientific term is
psychology circles. The fact that Berry's 'escape' can right on schedule
with me going to bed and Rihanna's concert preparations further
highlights that Berry had been colluding with her captors and that her
captors were being protected from local law enforcement by people high
up in the US Establishment. The manufactured emotional attachment
between an abuse victim and their victim has an obvious relevance to
Rihanna's relationship with Chris Brown and the story will no doubt
develop into a discussion about how Berry/Rihanna can be
de-programmed/rehabilitated.
However this type of collaboration between captive and captor is also
hugely relevant to the current hunger-strike taking place at Guantanamo
Bay. What is happening there is that the actual CIA and the detainees
have got together to create this 'crisis' in order to put pressure on
President Obama to close Guantanamo Bay. This detainees motivation for
this is pretty obvious - after all being in Guantanamo these days is
actually pretty boring. The CIA's role is more complicated. The key
sticking point to the closure of Guantanamo is the return of 8 detainees
to Yemen. Yemen is of course the home base of Al Qaeda in the Arabian
Peninsula (AQAP) who supposedly run the online magazine "Inspire" that
taught the Tsarnaev brothers how to build the Boston marathon bombs. As
the Guantanamo hunger-strike began the week before the marathon bombings
the CIA is clearly very keen for the issue of AQAP to be discussed
however I've avoided commenting on it because I do not think it would be
appropriate to do so on the world wide web and I have not suddenly
changed my mind. Needless to say though by pushing the issue for such
wide discussion the CIA clearly doesn't want the men returned to Yemen
so they can be used as double agents in order to weaken AQAP.
While the Amanada Berry story was developing the documentary on
Rihanna's 777 Tour aired on the FOX network in the US. Although I
haven't looked I suspect this generated quite a response on social media
- some good, some bad. After all apart from costing Rihanna a small
fortune (USD300,000 in airport fines in the UK alone) it p*ssed off a
lot of people including national governments some of whom have their
armies of Internet trolls.
As for Rihanna's concert itself it was a disaster. Rihanna eventually
arrived on stage some three hours late. That is her usual one hour of
lateness plus two further hours. Over the sound of booing those fans who
bothered to stay until Rihanna took to the stage got to seen her lazily
work her way through the usual set-list and costume changes. In the
absence of any apology from Rihanna or her people we are left
speculating whether the delay was caused by Rihanna getting stressed out
by all the drama or whether Rihanna was simply sulking because the
concert meant she was unable to go to Vogue magazine's Met Ball fashion
party.
Neither of these things are true because no-one can be that stupid or
that stoned. Instead Rihanna was three hours late on stage simply
because her handlers told her to be three hours late. They no doubt told
her and their political masters that this was necessary because the
angry response would help the discussion about security at the Morocco
(24/5/13) concert while the discussion about whether the emotional
stress of the angry reaction would force Rihanna back into Chris Brown's
arms would help save women in Islamic societies from forced marriage
and honour killing.
At 20:55 on 7/5/13 there's plenty more but I need a cigarette so let's consider this part 1.
Edited at 21:15 on 7/5/13.
The real reason Rihanna's CIA handlers instructed her to take to the
stage three hours late was of course to increase the tension at today's
international conference on the future of Somalia held in London, UK.
The idea being that by increasing the tension the US would be able to
help the UK gain increased control over Somalia. From a US perspective
this is an incredibly stupid thing to do because Somalia sits across the
Gulf of Aden from Yemen. As Yemen is effectively a client state of
Saudi Arabia if Somalia were to become a UK client state the close
allegiance between the UK and Saudi Arabia would allow the two nations
to close the Gulf of Aden and with it the Suez Canal allowing the UK and
Saudi Arabia to hold the global economy to ransom in the same way Iran
threatens to do by closing the Strait of Hormuz. Also UK control of
Somalia would allow it to be better able to control the smuggling routes
for timber and vital minerals (like Diamonds) out of the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) and the Central African Republic (CAR). From a
humanitarian perspective this would make the already dire situations in
those nations even worse. From a tactical perspective it would make the
US dependent on the UK for access to the minerals which are as vital to
the modern global economy as oil. Therefore while there are more
traditional ways to deal with them I think the US actually has a very
good chance of securing treason convictions against those running the
Rihanna/Chris Brown operation.
Demonstrating the level of collusion between the US and the UK over the
Amanda Berry case the UK was today all ready to go with its own version.
This revolved around the collapse of a trial against four men accused
of keeping men in servitude/slavery at a gypsy/traveller site in
Berkshire, UK in September 2011 after the Jury failed to reach a
verdict. One of the key problems with the prosecution is that many of
the victims refused to testify against the accused and some even went as
far as to thank them for their treatment. This of course also reflects
the manufactured emotional attachment between a captive and their captor
that is at the heart of the Amanda Berry case. Just to add an extra
level of confusion later in the day a different Court imposed prison
sentences against two men who had already been convicted of the same
offence in the same case but were being tried separately for reasons
that are in no way clear.
The UK followed this up with the Jury in the trial of Mark Bridger over
the abduction of April Jones being shown a one hour recorded interview
with one of the child eye witnesses. The April Jones abduction is of
course the UK's way of discussing Rihanna reuniting with Chris Brown in a
nightclub toilet in October 2012. The one hour video recording was
obviously a reference to the 777 Tour documentary. Therefore this
development was a way of finding out if any of the delegates had
actually bothered to watch the documentary. It was also intended to
raise the question of why Rihanna has so far refused to give evidence
against Chris Brown. That question was intended to be a test of the
intelligence of the delegates to see whether they understand the nature
of Rihanna and Chris Brown's relationship. After all while that is well
understood in intelligence/psychology circles in the developed world the
Somali government has probably got a few other things to worry about at
the moment.
As the attachment between an abuse victim and their abuser is always
relevant to discussions about the UK Commonwealth the UK Queen also took
the opportunity to announce that she won't be attending this years
Commonwealth summit. This gave the Commonwealth delegates at the Somalia
summit a code base to have discussions about things like Royal
succession while at the same time testing the loyalty of the
Commonwealth nations with particular attention being paid to Kenya and
Rwanda. It also raised the question of whether it would be acceptable
for the new Somali government to apply to become a Commonwealth member.
The UK's big play though was the start of the trial of Stuart Hazell for
the murder of Tia Sharp a 12 year old girl who was murdered in right
near me in Croydon, UK just before the 2012 London Olympics. The opening
arguments centred very heavily on the fact that Tia's body had been
discovered in the loft/attic of her grandmother's home. My father and I
are currently in the process of clearing out the loft/attic of my
grandmother's home. In an effort to increase the pressure on me the UK
has been spreading rumours that my grandmother's loft/attic is full of
very valuable things in an effort to encourage local criminals to break
in. Unfortunately it isn't and all the stuff is going straight from the
loft/attic into the car and then from the car into the city dump so any
criminals will be better off breaking into the local landfill site.
However the opening arguments of the trial also focused on the fact that
a large amount of child pornography had been found in Hazell's home.
This raises the possibility that MI5 could actually break into my house
and plant incriminating evidence such as child pornography. Of course in
order to achieve a prosecution this way the UK would then have to clear
a number of legal hurdles such as probable cause for a search and
reasonable doubt off the top of my head. That obviously tests the
intelligence of delegates at the Somalia conference to find out if they
understand these legal principles and whether they value them. Obviously
the UK would much rather work with a Somali government that doesn't.
All this talk of people breaking into my home to steal/add things
obviously massively raised the tension of my traditional Tuesday night
trip to the local pub where I could be beaten up by big, scary men at
any point. Here the UK actually made quite a slick move because the
Somali conference actually finished about two hours before I was
scheduled to go to the pub. This allowed the UK to claim to the
delegates who are still in the UK under the same level of stress that
all this wasn't intended to target them but to target the meeting in
Russia between US Secretary of State and his Russian opposite number.
Therefore the delegate would be much better off forming an allegiance
with the UK rather then the US because the UK is smart and knows how to
play the US for fools.
Of course I largely avoided this by simply not going to the pub
primarily because I've actually been really busy. However with so much
staked on there being drama surrounding my personal safety and security
the local little nigger network simply sent someone around to my house.
So as I was having a cigarette outside as their Russian press conference
was wrapping up I came across I heavily set gentleman of a Ghanaian
persuasion rooting around deep in my back garden. Obviously I've got a
feeling I might be having this read back to be in Court at some point so
let us just say he left on his knees with nothing worse than severely
damaged pride. I ended up with what is actually developing into quite a
nasty bruise on one of my knuckles. I would pursue him for assault but
he'll have an army of police officers to back him up. Hence the term
"little nigger."
(Originally Posted) 21:55 on 7/5/13.
No comments:
Post a Comment